Doric File Environmental Statement for West Way Plans

On Tuesday, 3 June 2014, Doric filed their long-awaited Environmental Statement with the Vale Planning Department.

The statutory consultation runs for three weeks, or until the 24th of June. Any comments received by that date are sure to be considered. You can still comment after that date, but as time goes on and the planning officers reports get more complete, the weight of comments’ influence diminishes.

So, get them in by the 24th of June. If you can’t make that deadline, get them in as soon after the 24th as possible.

You can see the HUGE Environmental Statement (including a Non-Technical Summary) and register your Comments on the Vale website here: http://www.whitehorsedc.gov.uk/java/support/Main.jsp?MODULE=ApplicationDetails&REF=P13/V2733/FUL

The docs are in the folder called 2014-06-03 Environmental Impact Assessment.

To file your comment, click on the Orange button Comment Now.

Or, you can see a printed copy at the Botley Library or the West Way Community Concern Shop in Elms Parade.

 

Doric & West Way – what’s next?

I’ve had a very informative meeting with Stuart Walker and Adrian Duffield, planning officers at the Vale. We talked about West Way, what’s happening now and what happens next.

As you probably know, the statutory consultation ended on 27 March. But the Vale will still accept comments up until probably the middle to end of May. Why so vague? Because none of the upcoming deadlines are cast in stone. Here’s the detail of what will happen:

  • Doric submit their Environmental Statement. They have indicated they are aiming for mid-May. This is not cast in stone.
  • Vale Officers will check it and notify the public of the consultation period.
  • A three week public consultation period begins, where everyone can comment.
  • Concurrently, the Vale will consult with their experts.
  • At the end of this time, Doric may submit any amendments that come about as a result of any feedback.
  • If Doric submit amendments, there will be another period of consultation.
  • At the end of all consultations, Stuart Walker will consider everything that’s been assembled from all consultees and will publish his report with his recommendation. This is the point at which we can see what he recommends.
  • A week after that, the Planning Committee will determine the application. This is expected to be the end of August, but that is only an estimate. We have requested that this planning committee meeting be held in Botley to allow people to attend easily. This may be problematic for two reasons: first, there is only one week notice of what will be included on a planning committee agenda, and second, there isn’t an abundance of selection for a venue that could hold all the people. But they have acknowledged our request.

Doric’s Environmental Statement must include several things, all of which are listed in the orignal decision published by Mr David Rotheray of the Vale’s planning department. I’ve put it on Dropbox, so you can see it by clicking here.

 

North Hinksey Neighbourhood Plan, I’m IN!

North Hinksey PC has asked us if we are for or against a neighbourhood plan for our area. I sent in my consultation response this morning. Here’s what I said.

Dear Alan,

Both my husband and I are in favour of a Neighbourhood Plan for our area. I am willing to help.The PC’s letter claims there is no more undeveloped land in North Hinksey. In my opinion, that’s not quite true and is only part of the picture anyway. There is the very large plot up beside the A420 behind Elms Road and Hazel Road for potential housing development. Additionally, there are plans mooted to remove lands from the protected Green Belt status, which could escalate in coming years. Also, there will likely be many more applications to demolish one or two family homes to build blocks of flats. Also, there was the hotly debated Oxford Brooke’s University’s master plan to redevelop their campus, which I expect to hear more about in future. And of course, we have no locally produced plans to help West Way development to meet local needs; if the current application is refused, there may be an opportunity for us to be more proactive in defining what this community needs from the West Way shopping area.

Another benefit, and maybe the largest one for us, isn’t mentioned at all in your letter. If we have a NP in place, the parish will get a guaranteed and larger share of the CIL money that comes with every new development. This money is for the parish to use in any way it sees fit to enhance the quality of life in the parish. I don’t understand why the PC decided not to let people know about this aspect.

Creating a Neighbourhood Plan is a proactive step we can take that can help us control development in the parish.

My understanding is that the first step is for the PC to apply for a Neighbourhood Area designation. Nothing has to be in place prior to this. Once we have that status, then there is advice and help available for the next steps. This isn’t a commitment to anything except exploring the usefulness of a NP for North Hinksey.Your letter and the choices for feedback (all in or not interested at all) makes it sound like there are only two choices. IN or OUT of Neighbourhood Planning.

In reality, there’s a third choice: Take the first step of designating this a NP area, because there’s a lot of public interest, and then we can find ways to explore how this could benefit the community and take the next steps if appropriate. I would have voted to do that.

And finally, we have an area here that we call ‘Botley’, which is larger than just North Hinksey. Botley has shown a keen interest in planning issues in our area. Please consider whether it might be appropriate to collaborate with Cumnor Parish in this effort.

Regards,

Debby

Deadline for reply is 15 April. You can email the parish clerk: nhpcclerk@msn.com

 

Vale Cabinet disagrees with its own Green Belt Review

The Vale Tory Cabinet commissions a review to find the bits of land next to settlements they can remove from the green belt. (Remember, development on green belt land is v difficult).

The review recommends several plots of land (all in Lib Dem councilllors’ patches, but I’m sure that’s coincidence) including Fogwell Road playing fields and Louie Memorial playing fields, both in Botley. (Actually, one in Cumnor parish and one in North Hinksey parish).

Same Tory Cabinet (on 20 Feb) writes a report and calls it ‘Council’s Response’). No author is listed, but the council never saw this, that’s for sure! I wonder if even the whole Cabinet saw and approved it. There’s no easy way to tell. Anyway, it’s more accurately, ‘Cabinet’s Response’.

‘Council’s response’ agrees with the removal of Fogwell Road playing fields from green belt protection. It disagrees with the recommendation to remove Louie Memorial Fields.

So, the Cabinet’s report (called ‘Council Response’) disagrees with the recommendation of the report commissioned by Cabinet.

It sounds like a comedy script.
You can see all these Green Belt Reports at this link (scroll down to Green Belt Review)

This is a consultation open until the 4th of April. Let them know what you think! Email planning.policy@whitehorsedc.gov.uk

 

 

 

 

Tory Green Belt Grab in Botley

Green Belt Phase 3 Report Feb 2014 Botley map-page-004The Vale Tories want to remove the Louie Memorial Upper Playing Field, and the Fogwell Road Playing Fields (plus two other plots) from the Oxford Green Belt, to free those sites up for potential housing development.

I’m grateful to an astute local resident for pointing this out to me. If I hadn’t run into him, I’d never have seen it, because it’s buried deep.

The Vale is in need of sites for housing development. One constraint they’ve hit is the Oxford Green Belt, which is protected against development in all but the most exceptional crcumstances.

The Tory Cabinet commissioned a study to identify all the bits of land in the Green Belt on the outer edges of settlements. They want to change the Green Belt boundaries to exclude these areas, so that they can be used for housing development.

See the reports here: http://bit.ly/1dmMMHB (scroll down to Green Belt Review). If you look at the Phase 3 report, see page 4. (I’ve reproduced it as a photo here; click on it to make it bigger.) These are part of the so-called ‘evidence’ supporting their Local Plan, currently out for consultation. There was no consultation briefing held in Botley, despite requests fron the parish council, ostensibly because there are no strategic housing sites proposed for Botley. But this Green Belt grab is serious business.

The Lib Dem group has fomally objected to this piecemeal tinkering with the Green Belt. But Local people may want to make their views more clear!

Consultation ends at noon on the 4th of April. Click here for how to comment: http://bit.ly/1gWSjDJ

Council Agenda for 19 Feb 14

The agenda for the Vale full council meeting on 19 Feb has been published. Click here to see it on the Vale website.

Mostly this meeting has to do with the budget for 2014-15. But there is some other business too.

I’ve tabled a motion intended to get the Cabinet to produce the legally required Action Plan for improving the air quaility in Botley. We have been a defined Air Quailty Management Area for many years now, and there is still not action plan, despite several assessments saying one is required. (To read more about AQMA in Botley, check out the Vale website, here. As I see this page today, the most recent doc there is from 2009. If you Google Botley Air Quailty Assessment, you can find the 2012 assessment — see it via this link. )

You may recall I’ve asked a formal question about this twice, once in July and again in October. Each time the Cabinet Member for Environmental Health promised action and didn’t deliver. So, I’ve upped the stakes.

 

Bike Safe gets Vale grant

Farmoor bike path teamGuest posting by Cllr Dudley Hoddinott of Appleton and Cumnor ward

This week, the Vale District Council awarded £3,870 to the project to build a community cycle and pedestrian path along the Eynsham Road from Swinford Toll Bridge to Dean Court, Oxford.

This money will help to fund a feasibility study containing outline design and draft proposals, as well as alternative options to deal with any constraints.

I was pleased to give a supporting statement at the Vale committee meeting to help secure the funding.

This grant comes from the New Homes Bonus community funding, money given to communities based on the number of new homes built in the area in the last 12 months.

We were thrilled to get this grant from the Vale, which moves the vision of a community path closer to reality.

The photo above includes the applicant, Ian Leggett, Chairman of Bike Safe (second from left) and me (third from left in front) with several supporters from Farmoor.

 

Doric update

There is none. No plans posted yet on the Vale site. Maybe everyone’s on holiday? Maybe it’s been cancelled and they forgot to inform us?

Maybe Doric didn’t send all the bits in that were expected with their application and the Vale are having to chase them?

For goodness sake. It’s been over 5 weeks.

(Update 30 Jan 2014 – I heard from the plannng officer yesterday. There are a couple of technical reports expected today, and that should be it.)