They just came up on the website this morning, and are still undergoing checking and re-organisation. You can see them here in the Amendments folder: http://www.whitehorsedc.gov.uk/java/support/Main.jsp?MODULE=ApplicationDetails&REF=P13/V2733/FUL
I think one good place to start is with the Design & Access Statement Addendum here: http://www.whitehorsedc.gov.uk/java/support/dynamic_serve.jsp?ID=328297503&CODE=05CE7BB6C9CA1A96204DEF38D05F51BA
Although there are typos and some errors of fact (the Design Panel was on 2 June 14, not 18 June 14 as this doc states), hopefully they aren’t anything material. Further study will show if there are important errors. If you find glaring errors that might bear on this planning decision, bring them to the attention of Vale officer, or to West Way Concern, who will be sure it’s handled.
But this doc lists all the changes, and plots them on a site map. It also explains the reasons for the changes.
Deadline for comments is officially 29 Sept, but there is some leniency in this. So plan for that date, and don’t worry too much if you go over by a few days.
Have submitted a response. Traffic plan still seems overoptimistic to me. Also given the reasons that 26-28 Westminster way were rejected due to noise surely the hotel and student accomodation being higher will suffer more which surely makes it contrary to Policy DC10 of the adopted Vale of White Horse Local Plan 2011 and to advice contained in the National Planning Policy Framework